PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Patient Safety· 2026Q1

Clarifying the Concept of “Unanticipated Transfer to the ICU”: A Scoping Review

Rachel Yeji Lee, Brian J. Douthit, Sachleen Tuteja, Patricia C. Dykes et al.

Short summary

A scoping review of 219 studies found significant variation in how "unanticipated transfer to the ICU" is defined and used, complicating research and clinical interpretation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A scoping review analyzed 219 studies on unanticipated ICU transfers.
  • Definitions and operationalizations of these transfers varied widely across the literature.
  • Most studies framed these transfers as negative outcomes or proxies for clinical deterioration.
  • A smaller subset of literature viewed them as appropriate escalations of care.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Unanticipated transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU), typically defined as an unscheduled escalation of care from inpatient general wards, is widely used in clinical research as a marker of adverse events, clinical deterioration, and system failure. However, its conceptual meaning, definition, and operationalization vary substantially across the literature, complicating interpretation and cross-study comparison. We conducted a scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines to map how unanticipated ICU transfers are defined, framed, and used in empirical research. Searches of PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science identified 4,019 studies through August 7, 2025. After removing duplicates, 2,092 studies were screened for title and abstract, 565 underwent full-text review, and 219 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were observational studies and terminology varied widely, with “unplanned admission to ICU” being the most common. Definitions were heterogeneous but generally focused on unscheduled ICU admission from inpatient wards, often excluding transfers from the emergency department or operating room and sometimes incorporating triggers such as rapid response activation or time-based thresholds. Unanticipated ICU transfer was predominantly used as a dependent variable and was overwhelmingly framed as a negative outcome or proxy for clinical deterioration. However, a smaller body of literature conceptualized these transfers as appropriate or beneficial escalations of care, particularly when occurring early in the course of deterioration. Our findings highlight definitional and conceptual inconsistency and suggest that unanticipated ICU transfer is a context-dependent process measure influenced by both patient condition and institutional factors. Greater standardization and a reframing toward appropriateness and timing of escalation may improve its utility in research and practice.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Patient Safety, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Emergency Medical Services

Emergency Medical ServicesHealth Professions