PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Construction Management and Economics· 2016Q1

The relationship between motivations of architectural designers and environmentally sustainable construction design

Niamh Murtagh, Aeli Roberts, Richard Hind

Short summary

Autonomous motivations, including moral imperative and personal commitment, were the primary drivers for architectural designers pursuing sustainable design, rather than extrinsic factors like regulation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Autonomous motivations, not extrinsic ones, were the main drivers for sustainable design among architectural designers.
  • Key autonomous drivers included moral imperative, personal commitment, self-identity, and pursuit of design quality.
  • These intrinsic motivations align with sustainability principles like durability and high technical standards.
  • Reliance on extrinsic motivators like regulation may be less effective than engaging designers through their autonomous motivations.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Research on sustainability in construction design has tended to focus on technological, institutional and economic drivers, but there has been little change in the industry. Social scientific approaches offer insights on the lack of progress. However, few previous studies have investigated psychological factors despite the pivotal role of the individual professional decision-maker. The aim was to understand what personal motivations drive architectural designers to pursue sustainable design in their work and whether non-environmental motivations can drive sustainable outcomes. Twenty-eight architectural designers in 14 small firms in the London area were interviewed. Thematic analysis was conducted, informed by the self-determination theory of motivation. Although extrinsic motivators were noted, autonomous motivations including a moral imperative and personal commitment predominated. Further, the participants demonstrated other self-determined motivations including realization of self-identity, pursuit of quality in design and awareness of their work’s impact on people. These autonomous motivations align closely with sustainability principles including design for durability, high standards and technical expertise. The findings point to the risks of reliance on extrinisic motivators such as regulation, and the opportunities to engage architectural designers more extensively in sustainable design by linking sustainability to autonomous motivations.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Construction Management and Economics, 2016 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Building and Construction

Building and ConstructionEngineering