DergiPark (Istanbul University)· 2013
BİR KARŞIT-BİLİM TEZİ OLARAK DİLSEL GÖRELİLİK: WİTTGENSTEİN, KUHN, RORTY, FEYERABEND
- 0citations
- 2013year
Short summary
This paper examines linguistic relativity as an anti-science thesis, questioning science's privileged position by framing it as a 'language game' or 'tradition' through the philosophies of Wittgenstein, Kuhn, Feyerabend, and Rorty.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Science is examined through the lens of linguistic relativity as an anti-science thesis.
- Philosophical approaches of Wittgenstein, Kuhn, Feyerabend, and Rorty are central to the analysis.
- Science is conceptualized as a 'language game' or a specific 'tradition'.
- The study questions science's exclusive claim to knowledge and its privileged position in understanding reality.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Bu çalışmada 19.yüzyıldan bu yana modern insanın başat entelektüel uğraşı olarak görülen bilim, bir karşıt-bilim tezi olarak dilsel görelilik bağlamında incelenecektir.Özellikle Wittgenstein, Kuhn, Feyerabend ve Rorty'nin yaklaşımları çerçevesinde bilimin bir "dil oyunu" ya da tikel bir "gelenek" olarak konumu ve postmodern durum içerisinde olanağı sorgulanacaktır.Bu düşünürler bilimin gerçekliğin bilgisini elde eden tek yol olmadığını ya da bilimin dünyayı yansıtan biricik hakikat olmadığını öne sürerler.Bu durumda bilim ayrıcalıklı konumunu yitirir.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. DergiPark (Istanbul University), 2013 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: History and Philosophy of Science
History and Philosophy of ScienceArts and Humanities