PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Clinical Psychological Science· 2013Q1

The p Factor

Avshalom Caspi, Renate Houts, Daniel W. Belsky, Sidra Goldman‐Mellor et al.

Short summary

A new 'p factor' dimension of general psychopathology explains mental disorder structures better than traditional models, reflecting a common underlying vulnerability.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A single 'p factor' dimension better explains psychopathology structure than three higher-order factors (Internalizing, Externalizing, Thought Disorder).
  • Higher p factor scores correlate with greater life impairment, familiality, and worse developmental histories.
  • The p factor is associated with compromised early-life brain function.
  • This dimension helps explain the difficulty in finding specific causes, consequences, biomarkers, and treatments for individual disorders.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Mental disorders traditionally have been viewed as distinct, episodic, and categorical conditions. This view has been challenged by evidence that many disorders are sequentially comorbid, recurrent/chronic, and exist on a continuum. Using the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, we examined the structure of psychopathology, taking into account dimensionality, persistence, co-occurrence, and sequential comorbidity of mental disorders across 20 years, from adolescence to midlife. Psychiatric disorders were initially explained by three higher-order factors (Internalizing, Externalizing, and Thought Disorder) but explained even better with one General Psychopathology dimension. We have called this dimension the p factor because it conceptually parallels a familiar dimension in psychological science: the g factor of general intelligence. Higher p scores are associated with more life impairment, greater familiality, worse developmental histories, and more compromised early-life brain function. The p factor explains why it is challenging to find causes, consequences, biomarkers, and treatments with specificity to individual mental disorders. Transdiagnostic approaches may improve research.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Clinical Psychological Science, 2013 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyPsychology