Environmental Science & Policy· 2026Q1
Waste(d) commons, transversal toxicity, and environmental (in)justice in Eastern Europe case studies from Câmpulung and Băicoi
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Toxic waste accumulates in Eastern Europe, creating a "negative commons" where harmful effects are shared despite fragmented responsibility, and former industrial/social commons are "wasted" by post-socialist transformations.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Waste functions as a "negative commons," where collective sharing of harmful effects occurs despite fragmented responsibility.
- Post-socialist transformations have "wasted" former industrial and social commons through privatization and deindustrialization.
- Initial waste dumping creates self-reinforcing cycles that attract further accumulation and integration into transnational waste networks.
- Repeated contamination and limited resistance normalize environmental harm, making waste an ordinary condition of life.
- "Transversal toxicity" describes the convergence of material pollution with corruption, political neglect, and an economy that reproduces dependency and inequality.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This article examines environmental injustice and waste economies in post-socialist Eastern Europe through case studies of Câmpulung and Băicoi, Romania. Drawing on environmental justice, anthropology, post-socialist studies, and 44 semi-structured interviews, we analyze how toxic waste accumulation, weak regulation, post-industrial decline, global waste flows, and class dynamics intersect. We develop the concept of the “double communality of waste.” First, we argue that waste functions as a “negative commons,” as its harmful effects are collectively shared despite fragmented responsibility. Second, we argue that post-socialist transformations have “wasted” former industrial and social commons through privatization, deindustrialization, and the erosion of collective infrastructures and values. Our analysis makes three key observations. First , waste invites waste: initial dumping, enabled by weak governance and uneven development, generates self-reinforcing cycles attracting further accumulation and integration into transnational waste networks. In short, where there is waste—where public infrastructure, nature, or human lives are “wasted”—more waste is created. Second , repeated cycles of contamination and limited resistance normalize environmental harm, rendering waste an ordinary condition of everyday life. Third , we conceptualize these dynamics as “transversal toxicity,” where material pollution converges with neglect, corruption, anticommunist discourses, and an economy reproducing dependency and inequality: the dumping of toxic materials is enabled by “toxic” corruption and political carelessness, unnuanced anticommunism and the indictment of any retrospective gaze, ultimately encouraged by a “toxic” economic model that lays waste to human lives and formerly thriving industrial communities.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Environmental Science & Policy, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Sociology and Political Science
Sociology and Political ScienceSocial Sciences