PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Wind energy science· 2026Q1

Identification of optimal ERA5 model level for wind resource assessments in mountainous terrain

Juan Contreras, Nicole van Lipzig, Esteban Samaniego, Daniela Ballari

Short summary

Using upper atmospheric ERA5 model levels (around 1000-1500m) for calibration significantly improves wind speed estimates in mountainous terrain, reducing annual energy production bias to under 7% compared to 22% with standard single-level data.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Upper ERA5 model levels (~1000-1500m) show stronger correlations with observed wind speeds at 80m in mountainous terrain than theoretical hub-height data.
  • Random Forest models using upper model levels improved Perkins Skill Score by 59%, R² by 40%, and MAE/RMSE by 23% compared to single-level ERA5 inputs.
  • Annual energy production (AEP) bias decreased to <7% with upper model levels, versus 22% with single-level ERA5 data.
  • Improvements are greater for exposed peaks, ideal wind farm locations, where local flow is better captured by upper model levels.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract. Accurate estimation of hub-height wind speed is crucial for wind resources assessment at prospective sites. Traditionally, long-term wind speed series are derived from short-term site observations combined with reanalysis products, most commonly the ERA5 single-level data at 10 m and 100 m heights. However, the coarse spatial resolution of ERA5 limits their reliability in complex mountainous regions, leading to weak correlations with local wind measurements due to not adequately resolved near-surface flow. This study investigates whether the use of wind speed estimates from upper atmospheric levels (i.e., model levels) of ERA5 model level data set can improve wind speed representation in complex terrain. We compared ERA5 with hourly wind speed observations at 80 m from four meteorological masts located at high elevations (2829–3796 m a.s.l.) in the tropical Andes of southern Ecuador, and developed site-specific Random Forest (RF) models for calibrate ERA5 wind speeds. Our findings reveal that wind speeds from upper model levels (~ 1000 – 1500 m for most of the sites) exhibit substantially stronger correlations with mast observations than the theoretical hub-height. Compared with single-level inputs, model-level-driven RF estimates achieved average improvements of 59 % in Perkins Skill Score (PSS), 40 % in R², and 23 % in MAE/RMSE. Importantly, the bias in annual energy production (AEP) decreased to less than 7 %, in contrast with 22 % when using ERA5 single-level data. These improvements were greater for sites located on exposed peaks, which are often preferred locations for wind farms, where the local flow is better captured by upper model levels. Overall, our results demonstrate that selecting appropriate upper ERA5 model levels offers a cost-effective strategy to generate accurate, site-specific hub-height wind speed time series in complex terrain. We encourage the wind energy community to exploit these upper atmospheric levels of ERA5 to enhance wind resource assessments in mountainous regions.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Wind energy science, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Aerospace Engineering

Aerospace EngineeringEngineering