PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Psychological Science in the Public Interest· 2019Q1

Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements

Lisa Feldman Barrett, Ralph Adolphs, Stacy Marsella, Aleix M. Martı́nez et al.

Short summary

Facial movements, assumed to readily reveal emotions, are not reliable indicators; similar movements can express multiple emotions or non-emotional information, and expressions vary significantly across cultures and contexts.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The widespread belief that facial movements directly reveal specific emotions is not fully supported by scientific evidence.
  • Expressions of core emotions (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, surprise) vary significantly across cultures, situations, and individuals.
  • Similar facial movement configurations can express multiple different emotions or convey non-emotional information.
  • Current understanding necessitates further research into how people actually use facial movements to express emotions and social information in real-world contexts.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that a person’s emotional state can be readily inferred from his or her facial movements, typically called emotional expressions or facial expressions . This assumption influences legal judgments, policy decisions, national security protocols, and educational practices; guides the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illness, as well as the development of commercial applications; and pervades everyday social interactions as well as research in other scientific fields such as artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and computer vision. In this article, we survey examples of this widespread assumption, which we refer to as the common view , and we then examine the scientific evidence that tests this view, focusing on the six most popular emotion categories used by consumers of emotion research: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. The available scientific evidence suggests that people do sometimes smile when happy, frown when sad, scowl when angry, and so on, as proposed by the common view, more than what would be expected by chance. Yet how people communicate anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise varies substantially across cultures, situations, and even across people within a single situation. Furthermore, similar configurations of facial movements variably express instances of more than one emotion category. In fact, a given configuration of facial movements, such as a scowl, often communicates something other than an emotional state. Scientists agree that facial movements convey a range of information and are important for social communication, emotional or otherwise. But our review suggests an urgent need for research that examines how people actually move their faces to express emotions and other social information in the variety of contexts that make up everyday life, as well as careful study of the mechanisms by which people perceive instances of emotion in one another. We make specific research recommendations that will yield a more valid picture of how people move their faces to express emotions and how they infer emotional meaning from facial movements in situations of everyday life. This research is crucial to provide consumers of emotion research with the translational information they require.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2019 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyPsychology