Consciousness and Cognition· 2026Q1
The role of visual feedback in metacognitive judgments of motor performance
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Basketball players' confidence in predicting free throw success, but not failure, increased with more visual feedback after the shot (N=39 & N=21).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Visual feedback positively correlated with confidence in predicting successful free throws.
- This effect was not observed for failed free throws.
- Players appear to use visual cues for success assessment and internal signals for failure assessment.
- Different metacognitive judgments rely on different types of cues.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Predicting the outcome of one's actions is crucial for effective behaviour, yet the mechanical underpinnings of this metacognitive ability remain poorly understood. We investigated the impact of visual feedback on basketball players' ability to monitor the accuracy of their free throws. In two preregistered experiments ( N = 39 & N = 21), basketball players performed a free-throw basketball task while a visual occlusion was triggered either immediately after the ball left their hands or after 200, 400, 600, or 800 ms. Participants then predicted whether the ball was in the hoop and reported their confidence in their answer. In both experiments, we found that the amount of visual feedback co-varied positively with the capacity to adjust confidence to predictions following successful, but not failed, throws. This shows that during sport self-evaluation, people rely on outcome-related visual cues primarily when assessing success, whereas failure may be judged based on internal signals. Moreover, to investigate metacognitive architecture, we compared local and global, and prospective and retrospective, judgments, observing that the metacognitive bias differed as a function of the judgments. This suggests that different cues are used for the different metacognitive judgments.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Consciousness and Cognition, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Developmental and Educational Psychology
Developmental and Educational PsychologyPsychology