PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Social Theory & Health· 2026Q2

Obesity policy in Portugal: epidemiology, sociology and the limits of prevention

Berta Valente, Virgílio Borges Pereira, Fraga Silvia, Joana Araújo

Short summary

Portuguese obesity policies, despite aiming for upstream action, remain limited by a persistent focus on personal responsibility, misaligned with the socioeconomic realities of marginalized groups, particularly women.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Portuguese obesity policy is limited by a sociopolitical, rather than technical, focus.
  • Policies signal a shift to upstream action but still emphasize personal responsibility.
  • Class, gender, and stigma shape policy implementation, particularly for women and marginalized groups.
  • Obesity stigma stems from institutional processes that depoliticize structural health determinants.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Obesity prevention has become a prominent public health priority in Portugal, yet policy responses continue to engage unevenly with the social conditions through which obesity is produced and distributed. This paper examines Portuguese obesity policy through an integrated sociological and epidemiological perspective, arguing that its limitations are fundamentally sociopolitical rather than technical. Drawing on sociological theories of embodiment, class, gender, stigma, and power, it conceptualises obesity as an embodied expression of social inequality rather than solely an outcome of individual behaviour. The paper has three interrelated aims: first, to examine how epidemiological and sociological perspectives conceptualise obesity and its determinants, and the implications of these perspectives for prevention policy in Portugal; second, to analyse how recent obesity policies frame responsibility and address structural determinants through their strategies and instruments; and third, to explore how class, gender, and stigma shape the implementation and effects of these policies, and how alternative sociological framings might support more equitable prevention. Using Portugal as a case study, the paper analyses how welfare arrangements, political dynamics, and institutional framings shape national obesity strategies, including recent regulatory and environmental interventions. While these policies signal a shift towards upstream action, dominant discourses still prioritise personal responsibility, often misaligned with the economic, temporal, and social realities that structure everyday practices, particularly among women and socioeconomically marginalised groups. The analysis shows that obesity-related stigma arises not simply from interpersonal attitudes, but from institutional and political processes that legitimise culpability narratives and depoliticise structural determinants of health. More equitable obesity prevention requires moving beyond technical policy instruments towards a Health in All Policies approach that challenges moralised framings of responsibility and addresses the broader social, economic, and political conditions shaping obesity risk and lived experience

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Social Theory & Health, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Pharmacy

PharmacyHealth Professions