PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Global History· 2026Q1

The Right to Communicate: UNESCO and the politics of global communication, 1969–1987

S. Huxtable

Short summary

UNESCO's push to codify the 'Right to Communicate' (RtC) into human rights law between 1969-1987 ultimately failed due to conflicts between collective and individual rights, differing visions from the Global South and West, and opposition from Western governments and NGOs.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The 'Right to Communicate' (RtC) proposed expanding human rights to include horizontal communication between peers.
  • UNESCO led an international effort to define and codify the RtC into human rights law from 1969 to 1987.
  • Key obstacles included the perceived conflict between collective and individual rights.
  • Divergent visions for communication—state-led (Global South) versus anti-statist (originator Jean d'Arcy)—hindered consensus.
  • Western governments and NGOs opposed the RtC, fearing it would undermine freedom of information.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract The Right to Communicate (RtC) is the idea that individuals possess not only the freedom to ‘seek, receive and impart information’, as laid down in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), but also the right to communicate horizontally with their peers, using technologies new and old. The brainchild of Jean d’Arcy, a French broadcaster and official who argued in 1969 that Article 19 should be updated to reflect the new technological possibilities, the concept inspired an international effort to write the RtC into human rights law. This article examines the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization’s (UNESCO) campaign to define this new human right, showing how initial enthusiasm was undermined by a widespread conviction that collective rights were a threat to individual rights; the difficulty of squaring the Global South’s state-led vision of communication with d’Arcy’s anti-statist ideals; and the vocal opposition of Western governments and NGOs, who increasingly saw the concept as a threat to freedom of information.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Global History, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: History

HistoryArts and Humanities