Gerontology· 2015Q2· Review
Looking Beyond Chronological Age: Current Knowledge and Future Directions in the Study of Subjective Age
- 244citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2015year
Short summary
Feeling younger than one's chronological age is linked to better well-being, health, and longevity, but the reasons why and how this happens are not well understood.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Subjective age (how old or young a person feels) is a significant predictor of successful aging markers like well-being, health, and longevity.
- The antecedents (causes) and underlying mechanisms of subjective age are not well understood.
- Current research faces theoretical, methodological, and psychometric challenges.
- Future research should investigate intraindividual variability, determinants of subjective age, and its relationship with objective age and behavior.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The notion of the heterogeneity of aging goes along with the awareness that every person experiences aging differently. Over the past years, scholars have emphasized that the assessment of these subjective experiences of aging contributes to our understanding of a range of psychological and physiological processes and outcomes among older adults. One construct frequently used in this context is subjective age, that is, how old or young a person feels. Subjective age has been shown to be an important correlate as well as a predictor of markers of successful aging such as well-being, health, and longevity. However, less is known about the antecedents of subjective age and the mechanisms underlying the relationship between feeling younger and positive developmental outcomes. This article briefly summarizes and critically evaluates the empirical evidence on this topic and makes suggestions on how to address and potentially overcome currently existing theoretical, methodological, and psychometric challenges. Based on the discussion of these challenges, the paper provides directions for future research by outlining underexplored topics such as intraindividual variability and determinants of subjective age, the match between objective age indicators and subjective age, and how subjective age maps on behavior and functioning.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Gerontology, 2015 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Neuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyPsychology