Sociology of Health & Illness· 2012Q1
Ageing with telecare: care or coercion in austerity?
- 189citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2012year
Short summary
Telecare technologies, promoted to enable 'ageing-in-place', may coerce older people by failing to account for non-use and 'misuse', according to analysis of European-funded research.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Telecare is promoted to facilitate 'ageing-in-place' and address the 'age dependency ratio'.
- Analysis of European-funded research suggests telecare can be coercive for older adults.
- Non-use and 'misuse' of telecare devices are common responses that challenge the vision of independence.
- Redesigning telecare for creative engagement and co-production of care is proposed to avoid coercion.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
In recent years images of independence, active ageing and staying at home have come to characterise a successful old age in western societies. 'Telecare' technologies are heavily promoted to assist ageing-in-place and a nexus of demographic ageing, shrinking healthcare and social care budgets and technological ambition has come to promote the 'telehome' as the solution to the problem of the 'age dependency ratio'. Through the adoption of a range of monitoring and telecare devices, it seems that the normative vision of independence will also be achieved. But with falling incomes and pressure for economies of scale, what kind of independence is experienced in the telehome? In this article we engage with the concepts of 'technogenarians' and 'shared work' to illuminate our analysis of telecare in use. Drawing on European-funded research we argue that home-monitoring based telecare has the potential to coerce older people unless we are able to recognise and respect a range of responses including non-use and 'misuse' in daily practice. We propose that re-imagining the aims of telecare and redesigning systems to allow for creative engagement with technologies and the co-production of care relations would help to avoid the application of coercive forms of care technology in times of austerity.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Sociology of Health & Illness, 2012 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Neuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyPsychology