PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Macat Library eBooks· 2018

Culture's Consequences

Katherine M. Erdman

Short summary

Geert Hofstede developed a framework to interpret and measure cultural differences between countries, originally identifying five dimensions based on a survey of IBM employees.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Hofstede created an interpretative framework for national cultural differences.
  • His work stemmed from observations of cultural impacts on international organizations (IBM).
  • He defined five original dimensions of culture based on a large employee survey.
  • This provided a measurable way to understand and act on cultural variations.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The Dutch anthropologist Geert Hofstede is recognized as a pioneer in the fields of international management and social psychology – and his work is a perfect example of the ways in which interpretative skills can help solve problems and provide the foundation for strong thinking and understanding both in business and beyond. Hofstede’s central achievement was setting up an efficient interpretative framework for understanding the cultural differences between one country and another. Working for the international computing company IBM in the late 1960s, Hofstede noted that such cultural differences had huge consequences for international organizations. Up until then, while many inside and outside of business recognized the importance of these differences, little had been done to define precisely what cultural difference was and in what areas of life it was expressed. Hofstede’s insight was that if one could interpret and define the dimensions of cultural difference, it would be possible to measure them and act accordingly. From a vast survey of IBM’s employees in several countries, Hofstede originally defined five dimensions of culture: every society could be rated for each dimension, providing a useful guide to the kinds of cultural differences at play. As ever, good interpretative skills provided the basis for better understanding.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Macat Library eBooks, 2018 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Social Psychology

Social PsychologyPsychology