PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Health Population and Nutrition· 2026Q1

Between-cohort variation in the cardiovascular association and predictive utility of the triglyceride-glucose waist circumference index among ageing adults in China, England, and the United States

Siya Pei, Weiting Cheng, Xueyao Yang, Ying Chen et al.

Short summary

The triglyceride-glucose waist circumference index (TyG-WC) showed significant between-cohort variation in its association with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among ageing adults in China, England, and the US, with hazard ratios per standard deviation ranging from 1.24 in China to 1.01 in the US, and did not consistently improve CVD risk prediction.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The triglyceride-glucose waist circumference index (TyG-WC) showed varying associations with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk across cohorts: HR 1.24 (China), 1.19 (England), and 1.01 (US) per within-cohort standard deviation.
  • TyG-WC did not consistently improve discrimination, prediction error, or net benefit for CVD risk.
  • Absolute-risk performance of TyG-WC was sensitive to cohort composition, outcome ascertainment, and prediction horizon.
  • Calibration slopes ranged from 0.08 to 0.76 and observed-to-expected risk ratios from 0.33 to 2.71 across cohort transfers.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Low-cost metabolic indices could support cardiovascular screening, but their utility may vary across populations. We evaluated between-cohort variation in the association, incremental predictive value, and absolute-risk performance of the triglyceride-glucose waist circumference index (TyG-WC) among ageing adults in China, England, and the United States. We harmonized three longitudinal ageing cohorts. Weighted discrete-time models estimated associations with incident self-reported heart disease or stroke, and overlap weighting aligned measured case mix. Repeated participant-level cross-validation compared a flexible clinical model with TyG-WC and its source measurements. Six unrefitted cross-country transfers assessed discrimination and calibration under cohort-specific follow-up schedules; because exact common horizons could not be reconstructed from interval-censored interviews, these analyses were interpreted as non-equivalent-horizon calibration stress tests rather than direct validation of a common-time absolute-risk model. Association analyses included 3,511 participants with 749 events in China, 2,358 with 689 events in England, and 1,865 with 249 events in the United States. Hazard ratios per within-cohort standard deviation of TyG-WC were 1.24 (95% confidence interval 1.14–1.35), 1.19 (1.09–1.29), and 1.01 (0.85–1.21), respectively. Overlap weighting balanced measured case mix but did not make associations uniform. TyG-WC did not consistently improve discrimination, prediction error, or net benefit. Across six transfers, calibration slopes ranged from 0.08 to 0.76 and observed-to-expected risk ratios from 0.33 to 2.71. TyG-WC showed between-cohort variation in its association with cardiovascular disease; evidence for effect modification depended on the exposure scale and should be interpreted cautiously. Its incremental predictive value was small and inconsistent, and absolute-risk performance was sensitive to cohort composition, outcome ascertainment, and prediction horizon. This study did not directly evaluate whether a specific TyG-WC cut-off could be transported across populations; local validation and calibration are required before implementation.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Health Population and Nutrition, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Endocrinology, Diabetes and MetabolismMedicine