Journal of the American Statistical Association· 2016Q1
A Model of Text for Experimentation in the Social Sciences
- 733citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2016year
Short summary
This paper introduces a hierarchical mixed membership model for text analysis that allows researchers to experimentally assess the drivers of topical content in documents.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Introduces a hierarchical mixed membership model for text analysis.
- Parameterizes mixing weights by observed covariates to link topic prevalence to external factors.
- Enables experimental inference about social and political processes driving discourse.
- Demonstrates quantifying the effect of news source on topic frequency and content.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Statistical models of text have become increasingly popular in statistics and computer science as a method of exploring large document collections. Social scientists often want to move beyond exploration, to measurement and experimentation, and make inference about social and political processes that drive discourse and content. In this article, we develop a model of text data that supports this type of substantive research. Our approach is to posit a hierarchical mixed membership model for analyzing topical content of documents, in which mixing weights are parameterized by observed covariates. In this model, topical prevalence and topical content are specified as a simple generalized linear model on an arbitrary number of document-level covariates, such as news source and time of release, enabling researchers to introduce elements of the experimental design that informed document collection into the model, within a generally applicable framework. We demonstrate the proposed methodology by analyzing a collection of news reports about China, where we allow the prevalence of topics to evolve over time and vary across newswire services. Our methods quantify the effect of news wire source on both the frequency and nature of topic coverage. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2016 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: General Social Sciences
General Social SciencesSocial Sciences