PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Children· 2026Q1

Validation of the Gaslini Pediatric Nursing Score© to Assess Pediatric Patients’ Nursing Complexity

Roberta Da Rin Della Mora, Simona Calza, Roberta Tirone, Ilaria Artuso et al.

Short summary

The Gaslini Pediatric Nursing Score© (GPNS©) shows substantial inter-rater reliability (Cohen’s kappa = 0.785), quick completion (1.8 min), and high ease of use (96.7% positive rating) for assessing pediatric nursing complexity, but fair concurrent validity (Cohen’s kappa = 0.300) suggests further validation is needed.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The GPNS© demonstrated substantial inter-rater reliability (Cohen’s kappa = 0.785) among nurses.
  • Concurrent validity showed fair agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.300), with most disagreements between adjacent complexity levels.
  • Exploratory Factor Analysis supported construct validity by isolating a single factor of "nursing complexity".
  • The mean completion time for the GPNS© was 1.8 minutes, with 96.7% of nurses rating it as easy to use.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Aligning care delivery with patient needs is essential for the quality of care. As nursing needs vary in complexity, Nursing Patient Classification Systems (NPCSs) are critical to guide patient allocation to appropriate care settings. The “Gaslini Pediatric Nursing Score©” (GPNS©) was developed to assess nursing complexity in pediatric inpatients. Following face and content validity testing, this study aimed to validate the GPNS© by assessing its inter-rater reliability, concurrent validity using clinical judgment as the reference standard, construct validity, completion time, and perceived ease of use. Methods: A prospective observational validation study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric teaching hospital. All pediatric patients (from birth to <18 years) admitted to the 17 low- and medium-intensity care units during the study period were included. Data were collected via digital forms by shift nurse pairs. Results: Overall, 389 nurses participated; 192 patients were assessed in pairs, yielding 814 valid forms. Inter-rater reliability was substantial (Cohen’s kappa = 0.785), whereas concurrent validity showed fair agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.300), with disagreements occurring predominantly between adjacent complexity levels (weighted Cohen’s kappa = 0.523). Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) isolated a single latent variable, conceptualized as “nursing complexity”. The mean completion time was 1.8 min, with a 96.7% positive rating for perceived ease of use. Conclusions: Within its development setting, the GPNS© demonstrated substantial inter-rater reliability, short completion time, and very high ease of use, with EFA providing evidence consistent with construct validity. However, both the fair concurrent validity and the paucity of patients classified within the high-complexity level were not sufficient to consider validation of the GPNS© as fully established. Further studies against an external criterion and on larger samples of high-complexity patients remain necessary.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Children, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Issues, ethics and legal aspectsNursing