PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Frontiers in Veterinary Science· 2026Q1

A comparative study of diet choice and feeding management among UK pet and child caregivers

Rachel H. Lumbis, Philippa S. Yam, John J. Reilly, Samantha J. Fontaine

Short summary

UK caregivers frame nutrition as a moral responsibility for both children and pets, but prioritize children's feeding needs over pets', even when pets are considered family members.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Caregivers perceive nutrition as a moral responsibility for both children and pets.
  • Diet choices and feeding practices are influenced by psychosocial factors like knowledge, beliefs, routines, and social norms.
  • Children's feeding involves negotiation and bidirectional preferences, while pet feeding is more caregiver-directed.
  • Despite pets being considered family, children's feeding needs are prioritized over pets'.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Introduction Caregivers play a central role in shaping the dietary habits and nutritional health of dependents. However, the diversity of available diets and feeding advice can complicate everyday food decisions. This qualitative study explored how caregivers make feeding decisions for their children and pets, focusing on factors influencing diet choice, feeding practices, perceptions of nutrition, and emotional attachment to dependents. Methods UK-based caregivers aged 18 years or older, responsible for at least one child aged up to 10 years and a cat and/or dog, were recruited between July and November 2024. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with 17 participants. Audio recordings were transcribed and analyzed thematically using an interpretive approach. Ethical approval was granted. Results Four key themes emerged. First, participants framed nutrition as a moral responsibility across both children and pets, positioning feeding as central to health and wellbeing and shaped by knowledge, identity, emotional attachment, habits, and practical realities. Second, diet choice and feeding practices were shaped by psychosocial determinants, with caregivers’ knowledge, beliefs, routines, emotional motivations, and social norms influencing feeding decisions across both children and pets. Third, feeding dynamics differed between contexts. Children’s diets involved negotiation and bidirectional relationships shaped by preferences, routines, and agency, whereas pet feeding was more caregiver-directed, routine-based, and influenced by trust in nutritional adequacy and pet-specific needs. Fourth, feeding practices reflected relational attachment and emotional bonds. Discussion Although pets were considered valued family members, their feeding needs were generally prioritized below those of children. Across both contexts, caregivers relied on observable cues, emotional responses, and socially shared norms to assess appropriate feeding. Caregiving beliefs and feeding philosophies transfer across contexts in complex ways, highlighting opportunities for family-focused interventions that support evidence-based nutrition for both people and animals.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Nutrition and Dietetics

Nutrition and DieteticsNursing