Studies in Comparative International Development· 2018Q1
Measuring Polyarchy Across the Globe, 1900–2017
- 232citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2018year
Short summary
A new global dataset (182 countries, 1900-2017) measuring polyarchy, based on expert ratings of five components: Elected Officials, Clean Elections, Associational Autonomy, Inclusive Citizenship, and Freedom of Expression.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Introduces a new global dataset on polyarchy for 182 countries (1900-2017).
- Measures polyarchy using five components: Elected Officials, Clean Elections, Associational Autonomy, Inclusive Citizenship, and Freedom of Expression.
- Data is based on expert surveys with an average of 5 experts rating each indicator.
- Expert characteristics do not systematically predict their ratings.
- The new index shows strong correlations with other democracy measures but claims higher face validity.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This paper presents a new measure polyarchy for a global sample of 182 countries from 1900 to 2017 based on the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) data, deriving from an expert survey of more than 3000 country experts from around the world, with on average 5 experts rating each indicator. By measuring the five components of Elected Officials, Clean Elections, Associational Autonomy, Inclusive Citizenship, and Freedom of Expression and Alternative Sources of Information separately, we anchor this new index directly in Dahl’s (1971) extremely influential theoretical framework. The paper describes how the five polyarchy components were measured and provides the rationale for how to aggregate them to the polyarchy scale. We find that personal characteristics or ideological predilections of the V-Dem country experts do not systematically predict their ratings on our indicators. We also find strong correlations with other existing measures of electoral democracy, but also decisive differences where we believe the evidence supports the polyarchy index having higher face validity.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Studies in Comparative International Development, 2018 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: General Social Sciences
General Social SciencesSocial Sciences