PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Nature Computational Science· 2026Q1

Less can be more for predicting properties with large language models

Nawaf Alampara, Santiago Miret, Kevin Maik Jablonka

Short summary

Large language models (LLMs) fail to learn from coordinate information in scientific data, consistently underperforming specialized geometric architectures like Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for tasks dominated by structural effects.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • LLMs fail to learn from coordinate information in coordinate-category data, a fundamental limitation for scientific predictions.
  • LLMs excel at learning from categorical patterns but are 'geometrically blind' to structural information.
  • This limitation persists across LLM sizes (up to 70B parameters), dataset scales (up to 2M structures), and representation strategies.
  • Specialized geometric architectures (e.g., GNNs) consistently outperform LLMs on structure-dominated property prediction tasks.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Predicting properties from coordinate–category data—sets of vectors paired with categorical information—is fundamental to computational science, manifesting in materials science as predicting formation energies or elastic moduli from crystal structures. While large language models (LLMs) have increasingly been applied to such tasks, optimal strategies for achieving reliable predictions remain elusive. Here we report fundamental limitations in LLM’s ability to learn from coordinate information in coordinate–category data. Through systematic experiments using synthetic datasets with tunable coordinate and category contributions, and a comprehensive benchmarking framework (MatText), we find that LLMs consistently fail to capture coordinate information while excelling at category patterns. This geometric blindness persists regardless of model size (up to 70 billion parameters), dataset scale (up to 2 × 10 6 structures) or text representation strategy. For material property prediction tasks dominated by structural effects, specialized geometric architectures consistently outperform LLMs, as evidenced by a clear ‘Graph Neural Network Language Model (GNN-LM) wall’ in performance benchmarks. Our analysis provides concrete guidelines for architecture selection in scientific machine learning.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Nature Computational Science, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Materials Chemistry

Materials ChemistryMaterials Science