PLOS Sustainability and Transformation· 2026Q1
Using Natural Language Processing (NLP) to assess changes in transdisciplinary understandings across a large research consortium
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
NLP analysis of 63 interviews across a 6-year research consortium revealed a convergence in transdisciplinary vocabulary, indicating teams built a common language over time.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- NLP analysis of 63 interviews from a 6-year transdisciplinary research consortium was conducted.
- Co-word clustering identified nine themes but provided no clear findings.
- Analysis of transdisciplinary vocabulary showed a convergence across disciplinary areas over six years.
- The study identified a small set of jargon-free words and the time needed to build a common language within research teams.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Researching how to create just and sustainable futures for all requires innovative and mission-oriented transdisciplinary approaches. This article sets out our approach and findings following the assessment, using Natural Language Processing (NLP), of the development in transdisciplinary understandings across a large and newly-forming research consortium as it changed over the six-year period of delivery (2019–2025). Two outcomes were sought from this assessment: i) learning to improve the transdisciplinary working in new, large research teams aiming to solve complex global challenges; and ii) improvement of use of NLP for this kind of exercise. A research-on-research workstream provided qualitative data from 63 semi-structured interviews carried out with 39 consortium members, with three rounds of interview being conducted in Years 2, 3 and 5 of the programme. Drawing on this data, a ‘dual approach’ to NLP was used to assess changes over time and by discipline: i) co-word clustering of full transcripts; and ii) analysis of vocabulary identified as transdisciplinary. The co-word clustering identified nine themes, but no clear findings. However, the analysis of transdisciplinary vocabulary indicated a clear convergence across disciplinary areas over six years revealing both a small set of useful, jargon-free words, and the time it takes for teams to build that common language. The results and analysis indicate potential efficacy if certain conditions are made possible, such as data availability, but significant limitations were identified that would need addressing. The approach was labour intensive, though future iterations should be much less so if the limitations can be addressed.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Information Systems and Management
Information Systems and ManagementDecision Sciences