Forest Policy and Economics· 2019Q1
Forest and wildlife resource-conservation efforts based on indigenous knowledge: The case of Nharira community in Chikomba district, Zimbabwe
- 108citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2019year
Short summary
The Nharira community in Zimbabwe's Chikomba district actively conserves forest and wildlife resources using a combination of customary rules, rituals, taboos, totems, metaphors, and proverbs.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Nharira community in Chikomba district, Zimbabwe, uses indigenous knowledge for resource conservation.
- Conservation strategies include customary rules, rituals, taboos, totems, metaphors, and proverbs.
- These practices are integrated into the community's social and religious values.
- Qualitative methods (interviews, focus groups) were used to gather data from villagers.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Forest and wildlife resources are indispensable for the provision of ecosystem goods and services; as well as spiritual and cultural values in rural areas. In most unprotected areas, these resources are increasingly under threat prompting indigenous communities to apply their local knowledge in an effort to conserve them. Therefore, this study documents how the Nharira community of Chikomba district, Zimbabwe is using indigenous knowledge to conserve forest and wildlife resources. Qualitative methods involving interviews and focus group discussions with villagers were used to gather data. The participants were purposively selected by the traditional leaders on the basis of their rich indigenous knowledge and participation in cultural ceremonies and rituals. The study found wide use of (a) customary rules and regulations, (b) customs and rituals, (c) taboos and totems, and (d) metaphors and proverbs applied in forest and wildlife resource conservation. These forms of indigenous knowledge constitute the social and religious values of the Nharira community that are used in conserving the human-environment system.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Forest Policy and Economics, 2019 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Archeology (Social Sciences)
ArcheologySocial Sciences