PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Environmental Science & Technology· 2026Q1

Covering and Flaring Manure Storage Units as a Methane Mitigation Strategy for Small- to Midsize Dairy Operations in the United States

Reza Keshavarz Afshar, Jim Wallace, April B. Leytem, Tim Kurt

Short summary

Covering manure storages and flaring captured methane (cap-and-flare) can mitigate 16-30% of US dairy manure methane emissions, offering a cost-efficient alternative to anaerobic digestion for smaller operations.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Cap-and-flare technology can mitigate 16-30% of US dairy manure methane emissions.
  • The estimated annual mitigation potential ranges from 5.53 to 10.36 MMT CO2e under full adoption.
  • Levelized Costs of Mitigation (LCOM) are estimated between $29-$55 t–1 CO2e.
  • This technology is technically feasible and cost-efficient for small- to midsize dairy operations (<1,000 cows).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Covering manure storages and flaring the captured methane (cap-and-flare) offers a technically feasible mitigation pathway for small- and midsize dairies that has received limited attention relative to anaerobic digestion (AD). While AD systems are more economically feasible for large operations, the dairy segment with fewer than 1,000 cows still produces approximately 34% of U.S. milk and remains largely unaddressed. We estimated technical CH4 mitigation potential under full cap-and-flare adoption using the IPCC Tier 2 model for 8,675 dairy farms across 38 US states. Under 100% adoption, liquid storage CH4 mitigation potential (GWP100 = 27) ranged from 5.53 MMT CO2e yr–1 (central 90% interval: 3.70–6.63) to 10.36 (central 90% interval: 6.93–12.42) depending on the Arrhenius activation energy and reference temperature constants applied, representing 16–30% of the CO2e attributed to dairy manure CH4 in the 2022 EPA Greenhouse Gas Inventory. These values represent an upper-bound technical potential rather than a projected deployment level. Average national Levelized Costs of Mitigation (LCOM) ranged from $55 t–1 CO2e (conservative parametrization) to $29 t–1 CO2e (upper-bound parametrization), positioning cap-and-flare as a cost-efficient CH4 mitigation option. Existing USDA-NRCS Conservation Practice Standard 367 provides an available incentive mechanism, although meaningful scale-up will likely require dedicated funding for infrastructure and technical assistance. These results suggest that cap-and-flare could complement AD as a mitigation pathway for U.S. dairy operations where AD is not economically viable.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Environmental Science & Technology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Building and Construction

Building and ConstructionEngineering