PofoliaPofolia ile paylaşıldı

Neurology· 2026Q1

Relapsing-Remitting Multipl Sklerozda Ofatumumab ve Ocrelizumab Karşılaştırması

Ofatumumab vs Ocrelizumab in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Sahla El Mahdaoui, Luigi Pontieri, Jeppe Romme Christensen, Hiba Alabdalridha ve diğerleri

Kısa özet

Relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) hastalarında ofatumumab, ocrelizumab'a kıyasla marjinal olarak daha yüksek yıllık nüks oranına (ARR) sahipken (ARR oran oranı 1.18, p=0.018), her iki tedavi de çok düşük ARR'ler göstermiştir.

Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.

Ana noktalar

  • Ofatumumab, RRMS hastalarında ocrelizumab'a kıyasla marjinal olarak daha yüksek yıllık nüks oranına (ARR) sahip olmuştur (ARR oran oranı 1.18, p=0.018).
  • İlk nüks zamanı, sakatlıkta kötüleşme, nüks aktivitesinden bağımsız ilerleme veya MRI lezyon aktivitesi açısından ofatumumab ve ocrelizumab arasında anlamlı bir fark gözlenmemiştir.
  • Her iki tedavi de çok düşük ARR göstererek her iki tedavi için de yüksek etkinlik sergilemiştir.
  • Çalışma gözlemseldir ve potansiyel kalıntı endikasyon yanlılığı riskini kabul etmektedir.

Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.

Özet (abstract)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: B-cell-depleting therapy with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies is a highly effective and increasingly used treatment strategy for multiple sclerosis (MS); however, comparative effectiveness of anti-CD20 therapies is unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ofatumumab compared with ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). METHODS: This was an observational cohort study based on data extracted from the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry. Patients with RRMS initiating ofatumumab or ocrelizumab treatment were included between January 2022 and November 2025. Primary outcomes were annualized relapse rate (ARR) rate ratio between the ofatumumab and ocrelizumab groups and hazard ratio (HR) for time to first relapse. Secondary outcomes were time to first 24-week confirmed disability worsening (CDW), progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA), and brain MRI lesion activity. We used the inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores to estimate the average treatment effects adjusted for baseline confounders. Main analyses followed an intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, with additional per-protocol (PP) analyses performed. RESULTS: = 0.018). The median follow-up time was 2.0 (interquartile range 1.3-2.7) years for the ofatumumab group and 2.5 (1.3-3.4) years for the ocrelizumab group. No statistically significant differences were found in the time to first relapse (HR 1.50, 95% CI 0.99-2.29), CDW (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.58-1.20), PIRA (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.53-1.15), or brain MRI lesion activity (HR 1.72, 95% CI 0.95-3.13). PP analyses yielded consistent results. DISCUSSION: The study indicates that ofatumumab treatment is associated with a marginally increased relapse rate compared with ocrelizumab treatment in patients with RRMS. However, the ARR was very low with both anti-CD20 therapies, and the difference is of limited clinical relevance. Important limitations include the observational design and the risk of residual indication bias. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that in patients with RRMS, ofatumumab is associated with a marginally increased ARR compared with ocrelizumab, with both drugs having very low ARRs.

Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. Neurology, 2026 · DOI ↗

ÇıkarımlarPremium
Makaleye SorÜcretsiz hesapla

Ücretsiz hesapla devam et

Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.

Web'de ücretsiz devam et

Google ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.

Telefonda:

Alan: Patoloji ve Adli Tıp

Pathology and Forensic MedicineMedicine