Radiocarbon· 2015Q1
The Transition from Bronze to Iron in Canaan: Chronology, Technology, and Context
- 82citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2015year
Short summary
Iron became dominant for utilitarian purposes in Canaan only from the 10th-9th centuries BCE (Iron IIA), coinciding with its systematic production, while local bronzesmiths adopted iron technology earlier in the late 12th century BCE (Iron I).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Iron was not used for utilitarian purposes before the Iron I (late 12th century BCE).
- Iron became dominant concurrently with the beginning of its systematic production during the Iron IIA (10th-9th centuries BCE).
- Local independent bronzesmiths adopted iron technology during the Iron I.
- Workshops shifted to iron production under local administrations during the Iron IIA, though bronze manufacturing continued.
- Independent iron production industries, including ore smelting, emerged at major urban centers during the Iron IIA.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
In the framework of the European Research Council-funded project, “Reconstructing Ancient (Biblical) Israel: The Exact and Life Sciences Perspective,” we carried out multiple analyses on iron and bronze objects from provenanced contexts in Israel, as well as on previously unidentified metallurgical remains from the production of both metals. In addition, we counted anew iron and bronze objects from well-stratified contexts and studied metalworking sequences at major sites, which included those that had undergone the bronze/iron transition. This enabled us to clarify some of the issues related to the bronze/iron transition in the southern Levant. Using this evidence, we showed that iron was not used for utilitarian purposes before the Iron I (late 12th century BCE) and that iron only became dominant concurrently with the beginning of its systematic production during the Iron IIA (10th–9th centuries BCE). A strong correlation between iron and bronze production suggests that during the Iron I local independent bronzesmiths adopted the new iron technology. Under local administrations that developed during the Iron IIA, workshops that previously produced bronze turned to iron production, although they continued to manufacture bronze items as a secondary venture. Significantly, at some of the major urban centers iron production was an independent industry that included the entire operational sequence, including the on-site smelting of the ore. This development appears to have been a major contributor to the transition to systematic production of iron.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Radiocarbon, 2015 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Archeology (Social Sciences)
ArcheologySocial Sciences