PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Political Science Quarterly· 2016Q1

Will More Countries Become Democratic?

Samuel P. Huntington

Short summary

The early 1980s saw a resurgence of cautious optimism regarding the global spread of democracy, shifting focus from the breakdown of democratic systems to 'transitions to democracy'.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Early 1980s marked a shift from pessimism about democratic breakdown to cautious optimism about democratic expansion.
  • The focus of academic and policy attention moved to 'transitions to democracy'.
  • This renewed optimism is being explored through social science theory and comparative political analysis.
  • Government initiatives like 'Project Democracy' and the 'National Endowment for Democracy' reflect this policy focus.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

WHAT ARE THE PROSPECTS FOR THE EMERGENCE of more democratic regimes in the world? This question has intellectual and policy relevance for the 1980s. During the 1950s and early 1960s, scholars concerned with this issue were generally optimistic that decolonization and economic development would lead to the multiplication of democratic regimes. The history of the next decade dealt roughly with these expectations, and people became more pessimistically preoc­cupied with the reasons for the breakdown of democratic systems. By the late 1970s and early 1980s, however, the prospects for democracy seemed to have brightened once again, and social scientists have responded accordingly. “Transi­tions to democracy” became the new focus of attention. The optimists of the 1950s were rather naively optimistic; those of the 1980s have been more cautiously optimistic, but the optimism and the hope are still there. Coincidentally, the Reagan administration moved far beyond the Carter administration’s more limited concern with human rights and first launched “Project Democracy” and “The Democracy Program” to promote democratic institutions in other societies, and then persuaded Congress to create a “National Endowment for Democracy” to pursue this goal on a permanent basis. In the early 1980s, in short, concern with the development of new democratic regimes has been increasing among aca­demics and policymakers. The purpose of this article is to use social science theory and comparative political analysis to see to what extent this new, more cautious optimism may be justified.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Political Science Quarterly, 2016 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Development

DevelopmentSocial Sciences