PofoliaShared via Pofolia

American Political Science Review· 2012Q1

The Perils of Unearned Foreign Income: Aid, Remittances, and Government Survival

Faisal Z. Ahmed

Short summary

Autocratic governments can extend their rule by strategically using foreign aid and remittances to fund patronage, thereby reducing the likelihood of government turnover, regime collapse, and political discontent.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Autocratic governments use foreign aid and remittances to finance patronage and extend their rule.
  • Analysis of 97 countries (1975-2004) shows unearned foreign income reduces government turnover, regime collapse, and political discontent.
  • A natural experiment on Muslim autocracies confirms that authoritarian regimes harness foreign income to prolong rule.
  • Governments in autocracies redirect aid and remittances from welfare spending to patronage.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Given their political incentives, governments in more autocratic polities can strategically channel unearned government and household income in the form of foreign aid and remittances to finance patronage, which extends their tenure in political office. I substantiate this claim with duration models of government turnover for a sample of 97 countries between 1975 and 2004. Unearned foreign income received in more autocratic countries reduces the likelihood of government turnover, regime collapse, and outbreaks of major political discontent. To allay potential concerns with endogeneity, I harness a natural experiment of oil price–driven aid and remittance flows to poor, non–oil producing Muslim autocracies. The instrumental variables results confirm the baseline finding that authoritarian governments can harness unearned foreign income to prolong their rule. Finally, I provide evidence of the underlying causal mechanisms that governments in autocracies use aid and remittances inflows to reduce their expenditures on welfare goods to fund patronage.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. American Political Science Review, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Development

DevelopmentSocial Sciences