PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Philosophy of Science· 2026Q1

Why No One Has Implemented the Turing Test: Identifying Turing’s Design and Putting it into Practice

Diane Proudfoot, Sharon Temtsin, Christoph Bartneck

Short summary

Alan Turing's imitation game, a foundational concept in AI, has never been correctly implemented because influential interpretations of its design are mistaken; this paper definitively establishes Turing's original design and presents the first execution of his experiment.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Influential interpretations of Alan Turing's imitation game design are mistaken.
  • The widely held belief that generative AI models pass the Turing Test is incorrect due to these misinterpretations.
  • This paper definitively establishes Turing's original conceptual design for the imitation game.
  • The authors report on the first-ever execution of Turing's experiment as he originally proposed it.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract In October 1950, Alan Turing proposed that a machine’s success in an imitation game provides a criterion for thinking. Turing’s test became one of the philosophical foundations of AI, but three-quarters of a century later, it is widely claimed that generative AI models pass the test, rendering it obsolete. Our aim here is to establish definitively Turing’s conceptual design for his game. We argue that influential interpretations of Turing’s design are mistaken, with the consequence that his test has not been passed. We also present the results of carrying out, for the first time, Turing’s experiment as he proposed it.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Philosophy of Science, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: History and Philosophy of Science

History and Philosophy of ScienceArts and Humanities