PofoliaShared via Pofolia

BMC Ecology and Evolution· 2026Q1

Sex differences in turtle vocalizations: social context and behavioural roles

Claire Voss, Njal Rollinson, Claudia Lacroix

Short summary

Male painted turtles produce a unique call type and exhibit greater variation in acoustic traits across social contexts compared to females, suggesting a role in condition-dependent signaling.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Five distinct turtle call types were identified, with one produced exclusively by males.
  • Male turtles displayed greater within-individual variation in acoustic traits than females.
  • Vocalization rates were negatively correlated with the number of close social interactions.
  • The findings suggest vocalizations are used at a distance, while visual/chemical cues dominate close interactions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Acoustic communication is widespread in animals, yet its function in turtles remains poorly understood. Although turtle signaling has been considered primarily visual and chemical, many species vocalize across life stages. We investigated adult vocalizations in the Midland Painted Turtle ( Chrysemys picta marginata ) to test whether call types and acoustic traits vary across social contexts. We recorded behavior and vocalizations during 35 h of 1-hour trials involving solitary individuals and paired interactions (male–male, female–female, and mixed-sex). We identified five distinct call types, including one produced exclusively by males. Acoustic traits varied across social contexts, and males exhibited greater within-individual trait variance than females, although some males experienced different pre-treatment conditions that may have affected vocalization patterns. While we cannot definitively identify vocalization function, theory suggests greater within-male variation may also reflect condition-dependent signaling under intrasexual selection. Additionally, vocalization rates were negatively correlated with the number of close social interactions, suggesting that vocalizations are used at a distance, while visual, tactile, or potentially chemical cues dominate at close range. Our findings push forward our understanding of vocalization types, turtle communication, and vocalization function, and we identify exciting pathways for further investigation.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Ecology and Evolution, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Developmental BiologyBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology