Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment· 2026Q1
Sustainable data-driven energy management with physics-informed neural networks for optimizing delivery routes
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A physics-informed neural network (PI-NN) accurately predicts UAV instantaneous power (R²=0.9383, MAE=30.03W) by embedding aerodynamic principles, outperforming black-box models and enabling energy-aware routing optimization.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Developed a physics-informed neural network (PI-NN) for instantaneous UAV power prediction.
- PI-NN embeds aerodynamic and kinematic principles, representing power as a sum of non-negative lift, drag, and propulsion.
- Achieved R²=0.9383, MAE=30.03W, and MAPE=9.31% on UAV flight data, outperforming black-box benchmarks.
- Integrated predicted power into an energy-aware mixed-integer linear programming model for route optimization.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Energy consumption during unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) flight is an important factor for operational range, mission feasibility, and economic efficiency in aerial logistics. We develop a physics-informed neural network (PI-NN) for instantaneous-power prediction. By embedding established aerodynamic and kinematic principles directly into the neural network architecture, the PI-NN represents power as the exact sum of non-negative lift, drag, and propulsion components. On UAV flight data, PI-NN achieves R 2 = 0.9383 , MAE = 30.03 W, and MAPE = 9.31 % . Recording-level tests show a significantly lower MAE than the strongest black-box benchmark. SHAP identifies the contribution of non-electrical flight variables to individual predictions. Predicted power is converted into arc-level energy and incorporated into an energy-aware mixed-integer linear programming model. In the four-UAV, 22-task base instance, the proposed optimization model yields a feasible 209.10-Wh routing plan and satisfies the prescribed 1% optimality-gap tolerance. Benchmark comparisons, calibrated energy quantiles, and sensitivity analyses further evaluate routing performance, prediction uncertainty, and computational scalability.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Industrial and Manufacturing EngineeringEngineering