PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Choice Reviews Online· 2012

Bootstrapping democracy: transforming local governance and civil society in Brazil

Short summary

Participatory budgeting reforms in eight Brazilian cities between 1997-2000 did not uniformly deepen democracy or empower civil society, with outcomes depending on the state's role in fostering an associational environment and its relations with civil society.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Participatory budgeting reforms in Brazil between 1997-2000 had varied impacts on deepening democracy and empowering civil society.
  • The study compared eight Brazilian cities, contrasting those with and without participatory budgeting reforms.
  • Outcomes were conditioned by the state's role in creating an associational environment.
  • The relationship between the state and civil society significantly shaped the effectiveness of institutional reforms.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Despite increasing interest in how involvement in local government can improve governance and lead to civic renewal, questions remain about participation's real impact. This book investigates participatory budgeting-a mainstay now of World Bank, UNDP, and USAID development programs-to ask whether its reforms truly make a difference in deepening democracy and empowering civil society. Looking closely at eight cities in Brazil, comparing those that carried out participatory budgeting reforms between 1997 and 2000 with those that did not, the authors examine whether and how institutional reforms take effect. Bootstrapping Democracy highlights the importance of local-level innovations and democratic advances, charting a middle path between those who theorize that globalization hollows out democracy and those who celebrate globalization as a means of fostering democratic values. Uncovering the state's role in creating an associational environment, it reveals the contradictory ways institutional reforms shape the democratic capabilities of civil society and how outcomes are conditioned by relations between the state and civil society.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Choice Reviews Online, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Development

DevelopmentSocial Sciences