BMC Oral Health· 2026Q1
A prospective study on the impact of various treatment modalities on myofascial trigger points in Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD) patients
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Stabilization appliance (SA) therapy and photobiomodulation (PBM) both improved clinical and ultrasonographic measures in Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD) patients, but only SA therapy significantly reduced myofascial trigger point (MTrP) stiffness in the masseter muscle.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Both SA therapy and PBM reduced masseter muscle thickness and improved mandibular movements in TMD patients.
- SA therapy significantly reduced myofascial trigger point (MTrP) stiffness in the masseter muscle.
- PBM treatment led to significant reductions in head and neck pain and improved protrusive mandibular movement.
- No statistically significant differences were observed between the SA and PBM groups for most evaluated parameters.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of stabilization orthotic occlusal appliance (SA) therapy and photobiomodulation (PBM) in patients with myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome (MPDS) through clinical and ultrasonographic evaluations. Patients were evaluated before and after treatment through clinical examinations and ultrasonography (US), with one group receiving SA therapy and the other PBM. Clinical assessments included pain levels, mouth opening, and mandibular movements, while ultrasonography focused on masseter muscle thickness and myofascial trigger point (MTrP) stiffness. Ultrasonographic evaluations showed significant within-group reductions in masseter muscle thickness in both the SA and PBM groups, while a statistically significant reduction in myofascial trigger point stiffness was observed only in the SA group. Clinical assessments demonstrated significant improvements in mandibular movements in both groups, with a significant increase in protrusive movement observed only in the PBM group, and a significant reduction in head and neck pain following PBM treatment. No statistically significant between-group differences were identified for ultrasonographic or clinical parameters. This study suggests that both PBM and occlusal SA therapy are associated with improvements in clinical and ultrasonographic parameters in patients with myofascial pain. Within-group analyses indicated reductions in MTrP sensitivity following SA therapy and improvements in mandibular function and regional pain following PBM treatment; however, no statistically significant between-group differences were identified. These findings suggest that PBM and SA may represent conservative treatment options that can be considered within individualized management strategies.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Oral Health, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Complementary and Manual Therapy
Complementary and Manual TherapyHealth Professions