PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Geoscientific model development· 2026Q1

High-performance geodynamics on GPUs using the PETSc CUDA backend (GAUZZ v1.0.0)

Kyeong-Min Lee, Deok-Kyu Jang, Cédric Thieulot, Byung‐Dal So

Short summary

The GAUZZ v1.0.0 solver, coupling CUDA-enabled PETSc with FEniCS, achieves a 5–11x reduction in execution time for geodynamic Stokes equation solves on a single GPU compared to a 32-core CPU.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • GAUZZ v1.0.0 solver couples CUDA-enabled PETSc with FEniCS for geodynamic simulations.
  • GPU implementation achieves 5–11x reduction in execution time for pressure correction compared to a 32-core CPU.
  • Nonlinear viscosity cases show 1.14–3.46x wall time reduction on a single GPU.
  • A two-GPU setup with MPS reduces wall time by up to 5.83x versus a 32-core CPU.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract. The GPU is a computing architecture designed for parallelism in vector and matrix operations. To solve the Stokes equations in geodynamics, we apply a preconditioned conjugate-gradient (PCG) method to the pressure Schur complement system. The algorithm is dominated by sparse matrix-vector products, vector inner products, vector updates, and repeated velocity subproblem solves, all of which map onto GPU architectures. We implement this solver on GPUs by coupling CUDA-enabled PETSc with FEniCS. PETSc AIJCUSPARSE matrices with CUDA vectors keep operators and field vectors resident in VRAM, which limits CPU-GPU transfers during iterations. The P1 mass matrix, the gradient operator, and the divergence operator are reused in the pressure-correction L2-projection step. HYPRE BoomerAMG was adopted for preconditioning the velocity-only subproblem. Accuracy and performance are evaluated on manufactured solutions, the SolCx benchmark, the sticky-air benchmark, 2D and 3D Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities, 3D thermal convection, and a 2D subduction model with nonlinear viscosity. We confirm that the GPU-based implementation reproduces CPU solutions. We distinguish between the execution time, which includes only the pressure correction step, and the wall time, which includes the workflow from mesh generation to Stokes solves. A single-GPU environment achieves a 5–11× reduction in execution time relative to a 32-core CPU. For nonlinear viscosity cases with per-step matrix updates, the wall time is reduced by 1.14–3.46× on a single GPU relative to a 32-core CPU. Using Multi-Process Service to coordinate two-GPU with a 16-core CPU reduces the wall time by 15 5.83× compared to a 32-core CPU.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Geoscientific model development, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Hardware and Architecture

Hardware and ArchitectureComputer Science