PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Environment and Planning D Society and Space· 2015Q1

Wet Ontologies, Fluid Spaces: Giving Depth to Volume through Oceanic Thinking

Philip E. Steinberg, Kimberley Peters

Short summary

This paper proposes an 'oceanic thinking' and 'wet ontology' to better conceptualize volume in geographical studies, moving beyond static, horizontal, and abstract models.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Challenges static and horizontal framings in geographical studies of place and territory.
  • Critiques existing approaches to volume for being abstract or reifying materiality.
  • Proposes 'oceanic thinking' and 'wet ontology' as a new conceptual framework.
  • Uses the ocean's voluminous, material, and constantly reforming nature as a model.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This paper expands on recent attempts to destabilise the static, bordered, and linear framings that typify human geographical studies of place, territory, and time. In a world conceptualised as open, immanent, and ever-becoming, scholars have turned away from notions of fixity towards fluidity and flow, and, in so doing, have developed networked, ‘flat’ ontologies. Recent attempts have gone further, challenging the horizontalism inherent in such approaches by opening up a vertical world of volume. In this paper we contend that such approaches are still somewhat lacking. The vertical element of volume is all too often abstract and dematerialised; the emphasis on materiality that is typically used to rectify this excess of abstraction tends to reproduce a sense of matter as fixed and grounded; and the temporality that is employed to reintroduce ‘motion’ to matter has the unintended effect of signalling a periodised sense of time that minimises the chaotic underpinnings and experiences of place. We argue that the ocean is an ideal spatial foundation for addressing these challenges since it is indisputably voluminous, stubbornly material, and unmistakably undergoing continual reformation, and that a ‘wet ontology’ can reinvigorate, redirect, and reshape debates that are all too often restricted by terrestrial limits.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Environment and Planning D Society and Space, 2015 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Geography, Planning and Development

Geography, Planning and DevelopmentSocial Sciences