Journal of Cancer Survivorship· 2026Q1
Supporting implementation of the national standards for cancer survivorship care: development of the cancer survivorship maturity model (CSMM)
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new Cancer Survivorship Maturity Model (CSMM) was developed and preliminarily evaluated to assess organizational capability and implementation maturity for national cancer survivorship care standards.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The Cancer Survivorship Maturity Model (CSMM) was developed to assess organizational readiness for national cancer survivorship care standards.
- The CSMM comprises seven domains and five maturity levels, ranging from ad hoc to optimized.
- Preliminary evaluations indicated low maturity levels (1-2) in most survivorship care domains.
- Key barriers to implementation identified include unclear workflows, limited resources, insufficient time, and technical constraints.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The National Standards for Cancer Survivorship Care define the domains of care that healthcare organizations should deliver, yet few tools exist to assess organizational capability and implementation maturity for the National Standards. We developed and preliminarily evaluated the cancer survivorship maturity model (CSMM), a framework designed to assess organizational maturity in real-world oncology settings. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods, participatory model development study. A preliminary CSMM was refined through five multidisciplinary focus groups at a comprehensive cancer center using consensus-building techniques adapted from nominal group technique. Participants completed prioritization exercises, contributed to model refinement, and assessed the maturity of survivorship care delivery in their practice settings. Qualitative analysis identified model refinement needs and implementation barriers. The final model was distributed to external stakeholders for preliminary evaluation. RESULTS: Fourteen internal participants and 12 external respondents contributed to model development and evaluation. The final CSMM included seven domains across five maturity levels ranging from ad hoc to optimized. Participants identified differences in prioritization across clinical impact, implementation feasibility, and perceived patient importance. Participants' assessment of survivorship care maturity was generally low, with most domains clustering between levels 1 and 2. Qualitative findings identified barriers, including unclear workflows, limited resources, insufficient time, and technical constraints. CONCLUSIONS: The CSMM provides a structured approach to assess organizational capability and implementation maturity for the National Standards while identifying domain-specific opportunities for improvement. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: By helping institutions target areas for improvement and resource investment, the CSMM may support more consistent patient-centered survivorship care delivery.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Oncology
OncologyMedicine