PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Current Anthropology· 2019Q1

Patchy Anthropocene: Landscape Structure, Multispecies History, and the Retooling of Anthropology

Anna Tsing, Andrew S. Mathews, Nils Bubandt

Short summary

The 'Patchy Anthropocene' concept offers a spatial framework for analyzing landscape structure, focusing on 'modular simplifications' and 'feral proliferations' to understand multispecies social relations through phenomenological attunement to specific histories, rather than abstract systems.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Introduces 'Patchy Anthropocene' as a spatial analysis tool for landscape structure.
  • Highlights 'modular simplifications' and 'feral proliferations' as key landscape features.
  • Advocates for understanding multispecies social relations through specific, phenomenologically-attuned histories.
  • Suggests integrating ecological modeling, political economy, and cosmologies for Anthropocene studies.
  • Addresses social justice concerns and critical hope in ethnographic research.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The Anthropocene deserves spatial as well as temporal analysis. "Patchy Anthropocene" is a conceptual tool for noticing landscape structure, with special attention to what we call "modular simplifications" and "feral proliferations." This introduction suggests guidelines for thinking structurally about more-than-human social relations; "structure" here emerges from phenomenological attunements to specific multispecies histories, rather than being system characteristics. Indeed, we discuss "systems" as thought experiments, that is, imagined holisms that help make sense of structure. Ecological modeling, political economy, and alternative cosmologies are systems experiments that should rub up against each other in learning about the Anthropocene. We address the misleading claim that studies of nonhumans ignore social justice concerns as well as suggesting ways that ethnographers might address "hope" without rose-colored glasses. This introduction offers frames for appreciating the distinguished contributions to this supplement, and it traces key changes in anthropological thinking from the time of this supplement's predecessor, the Wenner-Gren Foundation-sponsored 1956 volume, Man's Role in Changing the Face of the Earth. Rather than interrogating philosophies of the Anthropocene, the supplement shows how anthropologists and allies, including historians, ecologists, and biologists, might best offer a critical description.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Current Anthropology, 2019 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Geography, Planning and Development

Geography, Planning and DevelopmentSocial Sciences