PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Frontiers in Sociology· 2026Q1

Coping during wartime: a qualitative study on secular existential coping strategies of Ukrainians

Nataliia Melnyk, Fereshteh Ahmadi, Олена Віталіївна Ковтун

Short summary

Ukrainians facing wartime existential challenges draw on secular strategies like nature, cultural practices, civic engagement, routine, and contemplative activities for meaning-making, according to a qualitative study of 67 adults.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 67 Ukrainian adults were interviewed about their secular coping strategies during wartime.
  • Key strategies include nature, cultural practices, civic engagement, routine, and contemplative activities.
  • These secular strategies are embedded in cultural heritage, collective memory, personal agency, and social connection.
  • Secular meaning-making can complement religious and clinical support models.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Introduction Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has generated profound psychological and existential challenges. Although religious coping has been widely studied, secular existential meaning-making during wartime remains underexplored. Methods A qualitative design was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 67 adults aged 20-72 years from diverse occupational, regional, and religious backgrounds. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Five interrelated themes were identified: nature and physical space as sources of existential grounding; cultural and creative practices; civic engagement and solidarity; routine, work, and practical activity; and physical activity, meditation, and non-religious contemplative practices. These strategies were embedded in cultural heritage, collective historical memory, personal agency, and social connection. Discussion Secular existential meaning-making is a culturally grounded pathway of adaptation that can complement religious and clinical models of support. Psychosocial interventions in conflict settings should recognize psychological, existential, and cultural resources without treating religious identity as determinative of the coping strategies used.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Frontiers in Sociology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Health

HealthSocial Sciences