PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Seismological Research Letters· 2026Q1

A 3D Finite-Element Workflow for Mapping Earthquake Nucleation Tendency Under Tectonic Loading in Embedded Frictional Fault Systems

Zheng Li, Xiong Xiong, Greenhalgh Stewart

Short summary

A new 3D finite-element workflow maps earthquake nucleation tendency on faults without pre-assigning an initiation point, using differential onset slip (Δs(x)) between paired simulations as an indicator.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Presents a 3D finite-element workflow to map earthquake nucleation tendency on embedded frictional fault systems.
  • The workflow avoids pre-assigning a rupture initiation point by comparing paired simulations (gravity-only vs. gravity-plus-tectonic).
  • Differential onset slip (Δs(x)) between paired branches serves as a single-event indicator of nucleation tendency.
  • Mesh resolution impacts localization depth, with 1–2 km meshes showing consistent results at 15–16 km depth.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Dynamic-rupture simulations commonly prescribe rupture initiation, which complicates assessment of where instability would preferentially localize for a given fault geometry and tectonic loading. We present a 3D finite-element workflow that maps relative nucleation tendency on embedded frictional fault systems without preassigning an initiation point. Faults are represented as frictional contact interfaces within an elastic volume. Gravity is retained in both branches to provide the depth-dependent normal-stress background and stable contact closure on embedded frictional interfaces. The workflow employs paired branches on the same undeformed geometry with an identical mesh: a gravity-only quasi-static baseline and a gravity-plus-tectonic branch that differs only by a small displacement boundary condition. Each quasi-static state is transferred to a short implicit transient analysis on the same undeformed mesh under the same gravity and compatible boundary constraints. Slip may occur through the contact-state transition from sticking to sliding in the transient stage. We define the onset slip s(x) as the slip accumulated over the first N dynamic increments (default N = 1) and use the differential onset slip Δs(x) between the paired branches as a single-event indicator of nucleation tendency. Timestep tests over Δt=0.001–0.05 s identify the same peak node, and 1–2 km meshes give consistent localization at 15–16 km depth; coarser 3–4 km meshes shift the peak to 3–5 km depth, whereas the thresholded high-slip footprint remains resolution dependent.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Seismological Research Letters, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

GeophysicsEarth and Planetary Sciences