PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Business Strategy and the Environment· 2026Q1

An Application of Machine Learning and Textual Analytics for Visualisation and Enhanced Interpretation of Sustainability Disclosure

Tarek Rana, Peter Öhman, Jan Svanberg, Mohammad Saiedur Rahaman et al.

Short summary

A machine learning approach using VADER sentiment analysis, LDA topic modeling, and Doc2Vec embeddings analyzed 237 sustainability reports from Australian local governments (2015-2017), revealing predominantly positive/neutral sentiment, financial/environmental themes, and medium disclosure comprehensiveness.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Developed a machine learning approach combining VADER sentiment, LDA topic modeling, and Doc2Vec embeddings for sustainability disclosure analysis.
  • Analyzed 237 sustainability reports from 79 Australian local governments (2015-2017).
  • Disclosures showed predominantly positive to neutral sentiment.
  • Dominant themes identified were financial and environmental challenges.
  • The majority of reports were categorized as having a medium level of sustainability disclosure comprehensiveness.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Social and environmental accounting provides accountability mechanisms through which organisations communicate their sustainability practices to stakeholders. However, the increasing volume, complexity and diversity of sustainability disclosures make manual content analysis both labour‐intensive and susceptible to subjectivity. Machine learning and textual analytics offer promising approaches for systematically processing and visualising large qualitative datasets with greater consistency and transparency. This study explores how machine learning‐based textual analytics can be used to collect, analyse and visualise sustainability disclosure data in ways that enhance public accountability. More specifically, it focuses on how local governments use language to construct and communicate their sustainability commitments and performance. The empirical material consists of 237 annual reports from 79 local government areas in Victoria, Australia, covering the period 2015–2017. Drawing on a realist constructionist ontology, machine learning theory and stakeholder theory, the authors develop a machine learning‐based approach that transforms unstructured qualitative data into measurable insights. The methodology integrates VADER sentiment analysis, Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic modelling and Doc2Vec embeddings with cosine similarity to assess the comprehensiveness of sustainability disclosures. The analysis reveals that sustainability disclosures exhibit predominantly positive to neutral sentiment, with the dominant themes relating to financial and environmental challenges. The reports were categorised into three comprehensiveness levels, with the majority demonstrating a medium level of sustainability disclosure. Temporal analysis further suggests distinct patterns in how local governments frame sustainability initiatives and indicates that sustainability is conceptualised as a multidimensional construct. The study makes a methodological contribution by demonstrating how machine learning can enhance the rigour, scalability and transparency of sustainability accounting research. It also extends realist constructionist ontology into the domain of computational analysis and provides practical benchmarking tools for local governments. For stakeholders, the proposed visualisation techniques offer methods for assessing public sector sustainability accountability.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: General Social Sciences

General Social SciencesSocial Sciences