PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Review of International Studies· 2026Q1

Moralising geopolitics: Sexual shame and stigma in international relations

Dean Cooper-Cunningham

Short summary

This article theorizes how sexual shame and stigma are used to construct and maintain international order, arguing that anti-queer politics is a geopolitical tool for international ordering through sexual stigma.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Sexual shame and stigma are theorized as constitutive elements of international order.
  • Anti-queer politics is presented as a geopolitical project of international ordering through sexual stigma.
  • The article uses Russia and the USA as cases to illustrate how states and civil society mobilize sexual shame and stigma.
  • It introduces the concepts of 'stigmatic encounter' and 'stigma realignment' to analyze these processes.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract This article theorises the role of sexual shame and stigma in constituting and reproducing international order. Using Russia and the USA as illustrative cases, it argues that anti-queer politics is not an isolated domestic phenomenon but part of a broader geopolitical project of international ordering through sexual stigma. Drawing on queer theory, particularly work on shame and stigma, and connecting this to International Relations (IR) scholarship on stigma and civilisationism, the article develops a conceptual framework that accounts for the structuring role of sexual normativity in international politics. It demonstrates how processes of shaming and stigmatisation operate across scales, from the interpersonal to the international, sustaining hierarchies and legitimising geopolitical projects. Through an analysis of politicised homophobia and homophilia, the article shows how states and civil society actors mobilise sexual shame and stigma to carve out global moral hierarchies. In doing so, it makes the case that sexual normativity is not incidental to, but constitutive of, contemporary geopolitical contests, and that shame and stigma are key mechanisms through which the intimate and the international are linked. To make this argument, it uses two concepts: stigmatic encounter and stigma realignment.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Review of International Studies, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Gender Studies

Gender StudiesSocial Sciences