PofoliaShared via Pofolia

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· 2026Q1· Review

Apparent versus Cross-Validated Selectivity in Seawater Electrolysis: Linking Product Analysis to Catalyst–Electrolyte Interface Dynamics

박기상, Joon Yong Park, Amit Kumar Bera, Ho Jeong Kim et al.

Short summary

Seawater electrolysis selectivity is often overestimated due to chlorine species interconversion and catalyst degradation, necessitating cross-validated analysis beyond simple product measurement.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Chlorine products in seawater electrolysis can interconvert (Cl2, HOCl, OCl-) and partition between gas/liquid phases, affecting selectivity measurements.
  • Catalyst reconstruction, corrosion, or dissolution can alter active surfaces and contribute to currents not directly linked to measured products.
  • Apparent selectivity relies on limited product analysis, while cross-validated selectivity requires multiple complementary methods (gas/liquid analysis, pH, mass balance, catalyst stability).
  • Reliable evaluation of seawater electrolysis catalysts demands integrating product analysis with time-resolved characterization of the catalyst–electrolyte interface.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Selectivity in seawater electrolysis is commonly evaluated by comparing the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and chlorine evolution reaction (CER). However, the products measured after electrolysis do not always directly represent those initially formed at the catalyst–electrolyte interface. Chlorine generated at the anode can partition between the gas and liquid phases and interconvert among Cl2, HOCl, and OCl– depending on pH, reaction time, and mass transport, while further oxidation can produce more highly oxidized oxychlorine species such as chlorate and perchlorate. At the same time, catalyst reconstruction, corrosion, and dissolution can alter the active surface and contribute to currents that are not associated with the measured products. In this Review, we examine the major analytical methods used to evaluate OER/CER selectivity, including gas chromatography, ion chromatography, iodometric and N,N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine (DPD) assays, rotating ring–disk electrodes, and complementary electrochemical and operando techniques. We discuss what each method actually measures, its major limitations, and the experimental conditions required for reliable Faradaic-efficiency determination. We then distinguish apparent selectivity, obtained from limited or individual product measurements, from cross-validated selectivity, established by complementary gas- and liquid-phase product analyses together with pH, mass-balance, and catalyst-stability measurements. Based on these considerations, we propose a tiered evidence framework for evaluating and reporting OER/CER selectivity. Integrating product analysis with time-resolved characterization of the catalyst–electrolyte interface will provide a more reliable basis for understanding structure–selectivity relationships and for evaluating seawater electrolysis catalysts under realistic operating conditions.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the EnvironmentEnergy