Network· 2026Q1
Handover-Aware Conformal Throughput Intervals for Risk-Sensitive Rate Selection in Mobile 5G
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Conditioning conformal prediction on mobility state (RAT, time since handover) improves throughput interval accuracy for 5G, but a single global bound is superior for risk-sensitive rate selection, boosting link utilization by 10% at the same stall budget.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Conditioning conformal prediction on mobility state improves 5G throughput interval accuracy, especially for two-sided intervals.
- A single global conformal prediction bound is superior for risk-sensitive rate selection compared to mobility-conditioned bounds.
- The global bound increases link utilization by 10% at the same stall budget, robust to data zero-inflation.
- Real commercial 5G traces (188,711 s) were used to validate the findings.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Mobile applications that must commit to a data rate—video streaming, guaranteed-rate admission, uplink scheduling—can stall or breach a service-level agreement whenever they promise more than the radio link can deliver. What protects them is not an accurate average-throughput forecast but a trustworthy lower bound on the rate that will actually be available. Conformal prediction (CP) can produce such bounds without distributional assumptions, but mobile 5G throughput is piecewise non-stationary: it jumps at cell handovers and radio-access-technology (RAT) transitions, exactly where a rate decision is most fragile. A natural fix is to condition the CP calibration on the mobility-regime state (RAT and time since the last handover). Using 188,711 s of real commercial 5G traces, we show that whether this conditioning helps is task-dependent. It helps two-sided prediction intervals, whose error scale varies by an order of magnitude across RATs, and it removes the post-handover under-coverage of online adaptive CP at no width cost. But for the one-sided lower bound that actually governs rate selection, a single global CP bound is better: it delivers higher link utilization at the same stall budget, and this advantage is robust to the data’s zero-inflation. The practical lesson for rate-control designers is to match the conditioning to the tail the decision uses, and to judge uncertainty methods by the operational outcome rather than by coverage alone. All results are reproducible from a released pipeline.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Network, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Computer Networks and Communications
Computer Networks and CommunicationsComputer Science