PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management· 2026Q2

The use of a structured handover tool in danish intraoperative settings: insights from OR-nurses

Susanne Friis Søndergaard, Tove Karin Vassbø

Short summary

A structured intraoperative handover tool helped Danish OR-nurses maintain patient focus, distribute responsibility, and amplify professional voice, while also challenging existing norms and requiring alignment with local culture.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The tool supported OR-nurses in maintaining patient presence and continuity during surgery.
  • Nurses navigated the interplay between intuitive practice and the tool's structure, which could amplify professional voice.
  • The tool helped distribute responsibility, reducing the burden of sole accountability under organizational pressure.
  • Engagement with the tool shaped ethical orientation, professional identity, and team relations.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Objectives This study explored how operating room (OR) nurses make sense of and engage with a structured intraoperative handover tool, and how this tool shapes understanding, practice and relational dynamics during ongoing surgery. The aim was to illuminate how meaning, professional judgement and collaborative orientation unfold in the specialised setting of the operating theatre. Methods A hermeneutic qualitative design informed by Gadamer’s philosophy of understanding was applied. Fourteen OR-nurses participated in narrative interviews centred on lived, situated experiences of intraoperative handover. Narrative interviewing supported context‑rich accounts shaped by participants’ interpretative priorities. Data were generated and interpreted through Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis, with emphasis on meaning‑making and interpretative depth. Results The analysis illuminated how the tool supported OR-nurses in keeping the patient present and maintaining continuity in fast‑paced and technically demanding work. Nurses also negotiated the interplay between intuitive, experience‑based practice and the structure introduced by the tool, which could amplify professional voice while challenging norms. The tool helped distribute responsibility, reducing the sense of carrying ethical and clinical accountability alone under organisational pressure. These patterns revealed how ethical orientation, professional identity and team relations were shaped through everyday engagement with the tool. Conclusion The structured intraoperative handover tool acted as a meaning‑ and practice‑shaping element within intraoperative care. Rather than functioning solely as a technical aid, it influenced ethical awareness, professional identity and collaborative dynamics. This study highlights that structured tools must be aligned with local culture, workflow and professional judgement to support attuned and context‑sensitive intraoperative practice.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Emergency Medicine

Emergency MedicineMedicine