PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Sustainability· 2026Q1

Small Money, Significant Impact? Village Funds, SDGs, and the Limits of Participatory Governance

Gabriela Surowiec, Marek Furmankiewicz, Zbigniew Norbert Piepiora

Short summary

Polish village funds, small-scale participatory projects, can positively contribute to SDGs 3, 11, and 16 by enhancing well-being and social inclusion, but require baseline resident activity for success.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Polish village funds enable residents to initiate small-scale projects in public spaces.
  • These projects can positively impact SDGs 3, 11, and 16 through improved well-being and social inclusion.
  • Successful implementation relies on a baseline level of resident social activity and cooperation.
  • Village funds alone are insufficient to drive participation in exceptionally passive communities.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The village fund (fundusz sołecki) in Poland is a participatory governance mechanism for local community engagement and addressing community needs. It is organised voluntarily by municipalities within auxiliary administrative units, which most commonly cover individual villages. Residents prepare proposals for small-scale projects that involve activities or investments in public spaces within their administrative units. After formal verification, these projects must be implemented by the municipal office in the following financial year. This study aims to examine the geographical dynamics of village fund introduction across Poland, assess their significance for local communities, and identify their opportunities and constraints. Our analysis utilised national data from Statistics Poland, data obtained from a case study municipal office, and telephone interviews with village administrators. Local projects, despite their small scale, can positively contribute to the implementation of SDGs in rural regions, especially SDG 3, 11, and 16. They can enhance residents’ well-being through the development of safe and inclusive public spaces, social inclusion in local planning, and activities that engage and integrate local communities. However, successful implementation requires a baseline level of social activity to foster cooperation among residents during the project preparation phase. Village funds alone are an insufficient incentive for participatory governance in exceptionally passive communities. In such cases, traditional community development approaches involving professional facilitators may yield better results.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Sustainability, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Geography, Planning and Development

Geography, Planning and DevelopmentSocial Sciences