PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Lasers in Medical Science· 2026Q2

Comment on “Laser-induced modulation of root dentin surface for growth factor release and enhanced stem cell response”

Rodrigo Farias

Short summary

This commentary critiques a study on laser-conditioned dentin, highlighting that its findings on enhanced growth factor release and stem cell response are limited by a lack of laser-only controls, unproven causal links for TGF-β1 signaling, and the use of mature dentin, hindering direct clinical translation to regenerative endodontics.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The study lacked a laser-only control group, making it impossible to attribute effects solely to laser irradiation.
  • An association between TGF-β1 release and ALP activity was shown, but a causal relationship was not mechanistically proven.
  • The use of mature dentin and SHED cells limits direct clinical applicability to immature teeth and endogenous regenerative endodontic cell populations.
  • Dosimetry and thermal safety of the laser treatment remain unclear due to uncalibrated power measurements and lack of temperature monitoring.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Background: Laser conditioning of dentin has been investigated as a strategy to enhance growth factor release and cellular responses in regenerative endodontics. The recent study by Mokhtari et al. reported laser-induced modulation of root dentin, increased transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1) release, and enhanced alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity. However, several methodological aspects should be considered when interpreting these findings and their potential clinical translation. Main text: A critical analysis identifies important limitations in the experimental design. First, all laser-treated specimens were previously exposed to sodium hypochlorite, without a laser-only control, preventing the independent determination of the effect attributable to laser irradiation. Second, the concomitant increase in TGF-β1 release and ALP activity demonstrates an association but does not establish a causal mechanistic relationship, as no inhibition or neutralization experiments targeting TGF-β1 signaling were performed. Third, the use of mature dentin obtained from adult teeth limits direct extrapolation to immature permanent teeth, which are the clinical context emphasized in regenerative endodontics. In addition, the use of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) does not fully represent endogenous cell populations involved in regenerative endodontics, and cellular migration or chemotaxis was not evaluated. Finally, differences in power and exposure time among wavelengths, together with the absence of calibrated power measurements and direct temperature monitoring, limit interpretation of dosimetry, dose-response relationships, and thermal safety. Conclusion: The findings provide preliminary evidence that laser irradiation may modify dentin and influence growth factor release and cellular responses. Nevertheless, laser-only controls, mechanistic assessment of TGF-β1 signaling, immature dentin models, evaluation of cellular migration, calibrated laser dosimetry, and temperature monitoring are necessary to strengthen the mechanistic and translational evidence supporting laser-assisted regenerative endodontic applications.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Lasers in Medical Science, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Oral Surgery

Oral SurgeryDentistry