Nature· 2026Q1
Early tetrapod neck mobility modelled using an extant analogue
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new model using sturgeon as an analogue suggests early tetrapods had surprisingly rigid necks, with lateral flexion under 6° and dorsal extension under 3°, and no rotation, challenging the idea that neck mobility drove head-shoulder separation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Early tetrapod necks were modeled using sturgeon as an extant analogue.
- Estimated lateral head flexion was less than 6°, dorsal extension less than 3°, and rotation was not possible.
- Neck mobility did not significantly increase with the head-shoulder separation in early tetrapods.
- Forelimb-driven locomotion is proposed as a more likely driver for head-shoulder separation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Tetrapods arose from lobe-finned fishes with a notochord-dominated axial column 1–3 . During this transition, the skull became separated from the shoulder girdle 4–6 , giving rise to a neck region. This head–shoulder separation has generated hypotheses suggesting that neck mobility increased during the origin of tetrapods, facilitating the ecological transition towards more terrestrial habitats 4,5,7–9 . However, incompletely co-ossified vertebral components 10 have posed a challenge to modelling the mobility of these early tetrapod necks. Here we used material tests on the similarly configured axial columns of sturgeon to predict the capacities of the tetrapod neck region for lateral flexion, extension and rotation across the tetrapod stem. Our model indicates that the soft tissue-dominated axial column was surprisingly rigid, despite lacking co-ossified vertebral components. We estimate that most stem tetrapods could move their heads less than 6° laterally and less than 3° dorsally but could not rotate them. Notably, mobility did not shift in conjunction with the head–shoulder separation that occurred between the origin of tristichopterids (represented by Eusthenopteron ) and that of more crownward stem tetrapods. Therefore, mobility in the tetrapod neck did not serve as a functional driver of head–shoulder separation. Instead, forelimb-driven locomotion, implicated in early tetrapods 11–14 , provides a better functional explanation for the head–shoulder separation.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Nature, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
PaleontologyEarth and Planetary Sciences