PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Academy of Management Annals· 2020Q1· Review

Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research

Ella Glikson, Anita Williams Woolley

Short summary

This review synthesizes 20 years of research on human trust in AI, identifying AI's representation (robot, virtual, embedded) and machine intelligence level as key antecedents. It highlights tangibility, transparency, reliability, and immediacy for cognitive trust, and anthropomorphism for emotional trust.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • AI's form (robot, virtual, embedded) and intelligence level are primary drivers of human trust.
  • Cognitive trust is built on AI's tangibility, transparency, reliability, and immediacy.
  • Emotional trust is specifically enhanced by AI's anthropomorphism.
  • Current research limitations include diverse trust measures and overreliance on short-term, small-scale experimental studies.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) characterizes a new generation of technologies capable of interacting with the environment and aiming to simulate human intelligence. The success of integrating AI into organizations critically depends on workers’ trust in AI technology. This review explains how AI differs from other technologies and presents the existing empirical research on the determinants of human “trust” in AI, conducted in multiple disciplines over the last 20 years. Based on the reviewed literature, we identify the form of AI representation (robot, virtual, and embedded) and its level of machine intelligence (i.e., its capabilities) as important antecedents to the development of trust and propose a framework that addresses the elements that shape users’ cognitive and emotional trust. Our review reveals the important role of AI’s tangibility, transparency, reliability, and immediacy behaviors in developing cognitive trust, and the role of AI’s anthropomorphism specifically for emotional trust. We also note several limitations in the current evidence base, such as the diversity of trust measures and overreliance on short-term, small sample, and experimental studies, where the development of trust is likely to be different than in longer-term, higher stakes field environments. Based on our review, we suggest the most promising paths for future research.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Academy of Management Annals, 2020 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Safety Research

Safety ResearchSocial Sciences