PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Diagnostics· 2026Q2

Multimodal Cataract Severity Classification from AS-OCT Examination Reports: Analyzing the Complementarity of B-Scan Images and A-Scan Profiles

Min-Seok Kim, Gangmin Park, Ho Gil Jung, 이종주

Short summary

Combining A-scan profiles with B-scan images improved nuclear (N) and posterior subcapsular (P) cataract severity classification F1 scores by +0.030 and +0.094, respectively, compared to using B-scan images alone.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A-scan profiles combined with B-scan images improved F1 scores for nuclear (+0.030) and posterior subcapsular (+0.094) cataract classification.
  • The A-scan profile provided the largest improvement for posterior subcapsular cataracts at the Moderate severity grade (F1 from 0.183 to 0.336).
  • Fusion strategies combining B-scan images and A-scan profiles outperformed single-modality models, achieving average F1 scores between 0.514–0.531.
  • Masking the A-scan profile segment containing the posterior capsule significantly reduced classification performance for P cataracts.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Deep learning on anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) has been applied mainly to nuclear cataract. This study evaluated whether the A-scan profile in Anterion reports adds information to the B-scan image for classifying nuclear (N), cortical (C), and posterior subcapsular (P) cataract severity. Methods: B-scan images and A-scan profiles were extracted from 1416 reports of 691 patients. LOCS III grades were converted into three levels (None/Mild, Moderate, Advanced); inter-observer agreement was excellent (weighted κ 0.84–0.97). Image and profile encoders were combined using five fusion strategies and evaluated with patient-level 5-fold cross-validation. Results: Adding the A-scan profile improved F1 for N (+0.030) and P (+0.094) but not for C (−0.002). All fusion strategies outperformed single-modality models and performed comparably (average F1 0.514–0.531). For P, the gain was largest at the Moderate grade (F1 0.183 to 0.336), and masking the profile segment containing the posterior capsule caused the largest drop. B-scan line profiles could not replace the device-provided profile, and most misclassifications occurred between adjacent grades. Conclusions: The A-scan profile provided a useful incremental contribution, particularly for N and P, in this single-center dataset. The approach may be useful in retrospective and multi-center settings, but this remains to be demonstrated.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Diagnostics, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingMedicine