Journal of Stored Products Research· 2026Q1
Performance evaluation of an earth–air heat exchanger system for temperature and humidity regulation in underground granaries
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
An earth-air heat exchanger (EAHE) system significantly improved temperature and humidity uniformity in an underground wheat granary compared to conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV), reducing temperature field standard deviation by 54% (RSD to 1.73% vs. 3.76% under CMV at 198 m³/h for 12h).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- EAHE suppressed 'hot core' formation in underground granaries, unlike CMV which exacerbated it at high airflow rates.
- EAHE reduced temperature field standard deviation (RSD) by 54% (to 1.73%) compared to CMV (3.76%) at 198 m³/h after 12 hours.
- The EAHE system maintained a positive condensation safety margin (min 5.4 °C) and showed smaller temporal variations.
- EAHE achieved a fan-based COP of 14.6 and an exergy efficiency of 32.9%.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Underground grain storage facilities benefit from the thermal inertia of surrounding soil, but grain respiration and coupled heat and moisture transfer may induce condensation and mold growth, threatening storage safety. This study experimentally compared conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) and an earth–air heat exchanger (EAHE) system for temperature and humidity regulation in an underground wheat granary in summer. Seven cases were conducted in a small-scale underground granary, including static storage, CMV, and EAHE, with airflow rate and ventilation duration as variables. Twenty sensors measuring temperature and relative humidity were installed on the central vertical plane of the grain bulk, and four additional sensors monitored the headspace, ambient air, and air conditions in the ventilation system. Temperature and relative humidity distributions, field uniformity based on relative standard deviation (RSD), condensation safety margin, and energy performance were evaluated. The results show that CMV and EAHE differed in hygrothermal regulation. Although the cooling effect of CMV improved with increasing airflow rate, high airflow rates promoted non-uniform airflow distribution and heat accumulation in the central region, forming a hot core. In contrast, EAHE suppressed hot-core formation by preconditioning the inlet air through soil. After 12 h at a high airflow rate of 198 m 3 /h, the temperature field RSD of EAHE decreased to 1.73%, approximately 54% lower than that under CMV. At the monitored locations and times, the local condensation safety margin remained positive, with a minimum of 5.4 °C, indicating that the local intergranular air remained unsaturated. The EAHE exhibited smaller temporal variations in the condensation safety margin during ventilation. Energy analysis further indicated that EAHE achieved a fan-based COP of 14.6 and an exergy efficiency of 32.9%, demonstrating its potential as an energy-efficient ventilation strategy for underground grain storage.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Stored Products Research, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the EnvironmentEnergy