Journal of the American Chemical Society· 2015Q1
Benchmarking Hydrogen Evolving Reaction and Oxygen Evolving Reaction Electrocatalysts for Solar Water Splitting Devices
- 4,007citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2015year
Short summary
This study benchmarks 18 hydrogen evolution and 26 oxygen evolution electrocatalysts for solar water splitting, finding that many OER catalysts perform well in alkaline solutions, while few non-noble HER catalysts show promise.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Evaluated 18 HER and 26 OER electrocatalysts under standardized conditions for solar water splitting.
- Identified several HER catalysts with overpotentials <0.1 V at 10 mA cm⁻² in acidic/alkaline solutions.
- Found no promising non-noble OER catalysts in acidic solution.
- In alkaline solution, many OER catalysts achieved 10 mA cm⁻² at ~0.33-0.5 V overpotential, with comparable or better specific activity than Ir/Ru.
- HER catalysts generally showed much lower specific activity than Pt in both acidic and alkaline solutions.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Objective comparisons of electrocatalyst activity and stability using standard methods under identical conditions are necessary to evaluate the viability of existing electrocatalysts for integration into solar-fuel devices as well as to help inform the development of new catalytic systems. Herein, we use a standard protocol as a primary screen for evaluating the activity, short-term (2 h) stability, and electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) of 18 electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and 26 electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) under conditions relevant to an integrated solar water-splitting device in aqueous acidic or alkaline solution. Our primary figure of merit is the overpotential necessary to achieve a magnitude current density of 10 mA cm(-2) per geometric area, the approximate current density expected for a 10% efficient solar-to-fuels conversion device under 1 sun illumination. The specific activity per ECSA of each material is also reported. Among HER catalysts, several could operate at 10 mA cm(-2) with overpotentials <0.1 V in acidic and/or alkaline solutions. Among OER catalysts in acidic solution, no non-noble metal based materials showed promising activity and stability, whereas in alkaline solution many OER catalysts performed with similar activity achieving 10 mA cm(-2) current densities at overpotentials of ~0.33-0.5 V. Most OER catalysts showed comparable or better specific activity per ECSA when compared to Ir and Ru catalysts in alkaline solutions, while most HER catalysts showed much lower specific activity than Pt in both acidic and alkaline solutions. For select catalysts, additional secondary screening measurements were conducted including Faradaic efficiency and extended stability measurements.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the EnvironmentEnergy