PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Global Policy· 2026Q1

Foundational Fracture: Failing to Reform the World Trade Organization in an Age of Geopolitics

Michal Parizek, Clara Weinhardt

Short summary

WTO reform attempts are failing not due to specific disagreements, but a 'foundational fracture'—a deep split among members on the organization's purpose, coupled with an inability to update its framework.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • WTO reform failures stem from a 'foundational fracture' among principal members regarding the organization's purpose.
  • This fracture is compounded by the WTO's persistent inability to update its institutional framework.
  • Recent reform efforts have yielded only modest progress in informal, non-binding activities.
  • The findings suggest a broader challenge for global governance transformation beyond the WTO.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The World Trade Organization (WTO) is at the crossroads, with a principal challenge raised to the organization by the United States in 2025 and a series of related, largely unsuccessful reform attempts over the last several years. To shed new light on why recent WTO reform attempts have been proving so difficult, we leverage evidence from close to 40 interviews conducted in Geneva in 2024 and 2025, and an array of recent reform‐related WTO documents. We argue that the main reform failures do not result from design inefficiencies or specific well‐defined disagreements. Rather, we propose that the situation in the WTO is best described as a foundational fracture , a deep split among WTO's principal members about the very purpose of the organization, combined with a long‐term inability of the WTO to update its institutional framework, and the mutual reinforcement of these two challenges. We only identify modest reform progress achieved over the last years in activities that are predominantly informal and focused on information exchange, without binding commitments and the ability to address the deep‐seated institutional issues. These findings contribute to broad debates on global governance transformation, beyond the WTO itself.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Global Policy, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Political Science and International Relations

Political Science and International RelationsSocial Sciences